That evil creature in Congress Dianne Feinstein is at it again. Mrs. "Turn them all in" is looking to turn the tyranny up a notch, while trying to make it seem reasonable. With the recent attacks in Paris, we're seeing knee jerk reactions all over the place as per usual. This new push attacking the Second Amendment comes on the heels of a report talking about people on the "Terrorist Watch List" being able to purchase firearms in the US. So the rhetoric goes "We have to stop terrorists from getting their hands on guns!". Sounds reasonable enough, but there's one huge problem. There are over 700,000 people on that list, and a large majority of them have never committed any kind of criminal act. Making matters worse is the fact that this list is compiled completely extra judicially without any kind or real oversight, and worst of all, zero due process of law. This is literally the Federal Government saying, "we don't like you, we see you as a threat, therefore we are taking away your constitutional rights with no judge, no jury. Currently there is no legal recourse to get yourself off the list, even if it is found that your name was put on it in error.
This is the epitome of the "slippery slope". If we allow this to continue, how long before this spreads to regular Americans. If the Federal Government can just wave a magic wand and totally wipe away your rights, how long before this policy is applied to political dissidents? How long before they say, "People on the Terror Watch List are buying property! We have to stop it!". The political left likes to accuse their opponents of fear mongering, but now the tables have turned. This is just another case of "Give up your rights so we can keep you safe!". Cue the Ben Franklin quote.
This situation is quickly escalating, and who knows how far it will go. We know that Obama and his globalist masters are using Saudi Arabia to fund, arm, train, and deploy ISIS fighters to keep the world in a state of perpetual chaos. With Obama using the political correct hysteria already sweeping the country, he is attempting to shame and slander his opponents into backing down and allowing a huge influx of "refugees" from Syria into the US, and of course will give them the full run of welfare and government benefits all paid for by the taxpayer.
Unfortunately, when the ISIS attacks do eventually hit American soil, it seems like there is little chance that Obama will have the blame placed on him. He will give speech after speech attacking his political opponents, calling them racists, xenophobes, Islamophobes, and every other slanderous name under the sun.
If they had their way, the entire nation would be a "gun free zone". Except that is, for the select few that the Administration wants to be armed. The terrible reality is, this is a classic example of bait and switch. Obama and his cronies will scream bloody murder about terrorists getting guns, therefore we must limit the access to firearms for all Americans, while at the same time funding and arming the same terrorists they are screaming about.
Ultimately, it is the PC culture that will be our downfall if it continues unchecked. These people are not "checking your privilege", they are merely attempting to shame you into submission to their agenda. They don't want "equality" or "tolerance", they want dominance. They want to control the culture firstly through the control of language. Any kind of political dissent automatically becomes "hate speech". Against letting thousands of "refugees" into our country unchecked to suck off of the system? You're a racist, Islamophobic bigot.
Let's face it, no matter what they try to say about "vetting" these refugees, there is absolutely no realistic way to satisfactorily vet these people. They've come from a war zone, probably had their homes and possessions either stolen or destroyed, and most have exactly zero documentation of who they really are. Please explain to me how you're going to vet them.
Obama already has tried to shame his opponents into submission by implying that they are scared of "widows and orphans". While there may be widows and orphans among the "refugees", I've already documented in previous posts that the vast majority of these people are military age men. If Obama wants to talk about widows and orphans, then that should be our policy, women and children first.
Hillary Clinton repeatedly says "we are not at war with Islam", She cringes at the words "radical Islamic terrorism". I guess she expects us to forget about Paris, Ft. Hood, Chattanooga, The Boston Marathon, and the list goes on. But they need to shift the focus away because it doesn't take much research to see that this entire situation is being orchestrated from behind the scenes. The elite are funding both sides of the conflict just as they have with every major conflict since Napoleon.
If catastrophe is to be avoided, we're going to have to wake up, get loud, and be extremely vigilant. Cue Thomas Jefferson quote.
More on this coming as it develops. As usual, don't take my word for it, do your own research.
No comments:
Post a Comment